Early Chinese immigrant laborers were either unmarried or if married, separated from their wives and children who were still in China. One reason why wives did not accompany their
husbands was that the laborers initially planned to return to China after a few
years. Other reasons were cultural, i.e., families had wives remain in the
villages for diverse reasons. Wives in China would ensure the men would return, care for elderly parents-in-law, and
have their children grow up in China. Economic factors also played a role as many immigrants could not
afford to bring wives over.
In addition, after the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, Chinese laborers were prohibited from bringing their wives from China, a situation that lasted for decades even though the exclusion law was officially repealed in 1943. Consequently, Chinese immigrant men in the U. S. and Canada wanting to marry had few choices but to find non-Chinese wives.
In addition, after the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, Chinese laborers were prohibited from bringing their wives from China, a situation that lasted for decades even though the exclusion law was officially repealed in 1943. Consequently, Chinese immigrant men in the U. S. and Canada wanting to marry had few choices but to find non-Chinese wives.
Regional differences existed. In New York City, some Chinese
married Irish women, as they lived in nearby neighborhoods and both groups were
at the bottom of the social ladder. In the South, some Chinese married black
women who were in larger number than Irish women. For example, the census agent responsible
for counting the Chinese in Augusta, Georgia reported in 1905 that several of
the 34 Chinese men there were married and had families, all with "negro or
mulatto wives."
Miscegenation laws in many states until the middle of the past century prohibited Chinese men from marrying white women, but some marriages and common-law arrangements still occurred but were kept secret as much as possible. The offspring of these mixed marriages were socially ostracized, often rejected by both white and Chinese communities.
Miscegenation laws in many states until the middle of the past century prohibited Chinese men from marrying white women, but some marriages and common-law arrangements still occurred but were kept secret as much as possible. The offspring of these mixed marriages were socially ostracized, often rejected by both white and Chinese communities.
One analysis found that, "After the Emancipation Proclamation, many intermarriages in
some states were not recorded and historically, Chinese American men married
African American women in high proportions to their total marriage numbers due
to few Chinese American women being in the United States. After the
Emancipation Proclamation, many Chinese Americans immigrated to the Southern
states, particularly Arkansas, to work on plantations. For example, in 1880,
the tenth US Census of Louisiana alone counted 57% of interracial marriages
between these Chinese Americans to be with African Americans and 43% to be with
European American women. [Between 20 and 30 percent of the Chinese who lived in
Mississippi married black women before 1940. In mid 1850s, 70 to 150 Chinese were living in New York City
and 11 of them married Irish women. In 1906 the New York Times (6 August)
reported that 300 white women (Irish American) were married to Chinese men in
New York, with many more cohabited. In 1900, based on Liang research, of the
120,000 men in more than 20 Chinese communities in the United States, he
estimated that one out of every twenty Chinese men (Cantonese) was married to
white women."[i]
[ii]
Newspaper Accounts of Specific Marriages
Interracial marriages between Chinese men and white women in the late 19th and first half of the 20th century received extensive generally negative coverage in newspapers across the country.
In 1886 two Chinese laundrymen in Chicago, Sun Wah and Wing Lee, married young German women, Augusta and Lizzie Miller, to bring the total of Chinese laundrymen with German wives in Chicago to five. The two women were cousins who had come from Milwaukee three years earlier and worked at a restaurant where they became acquainted with the laundrymen who often took their meals there. Both laundrymen were members of a Sunday school where they learned English, but neither believed in the Christian religion. Sun Wah married 22 year old Augusta and another laundryman, Wing Lee, married Lizzie. Neither of the families of the two women objected to the marriages. After the wedding, the bridal party went by street car to Sun's basement laundry on Blue Island Avenue for a party.
Sunday School Teachers
Chinese-white marriages in cities with large Chinatowns such as New York often involved young white women who taught English to Chinese immigrant men at a Sunday School marrying a pupil.
In 1886 two Chinese laundrymen in Chicago, Sun Wah and Wing Lee, married young German women, Augusta and Lizzie Miller, to bring the total of Chinese laundrymen with German wives in Chicago to five. The two women were cousins who had come from Milwaukee three years earlier and worked at a restaurant where they became acquainted with the laundrymen who often took their meals there. Both laundrymen were members of a Sunday school where they learned English, but neither believed in the Christian religion. Sun Wah married 22 year old Augusta and another laundryman, Wing Lee, married Lizzie. Neither of the families of the two women objected to the marriages. After the wedding, the bridal party went by street car to Sun's basement laundry on Blue Island Avenue for a party.
In 1889, India Maughan, a Savannah woman married a Chinese laundryman, Long Parke. Two years earlier Wong Lung married a girl name Jennie. The newspaper report was not optimistic about their future and noted, "Their life was by no means one of unalloyed bliss."
Chinese-white marriages in cities with large Chinatowns such as New York often involved young white women who taught English to Chinese immigrant men at a Sunday School marrying a pupil.
A marriage between a Chinese Sunday school teacher, 28-year old Miss Lena Blumenshine, and
her laundryman pupil, Ching Lung, occurred in 1897 in New York City. It was reported that Ching Lung discarded his “native costume for a
more civilized one, and about four months ago had his queue shaved off. To further please his fair teacher,
Ching had his name changed to Thomas Tome.”
In San Francisco, Yung Sing, a Chinaman and Miss May Lewis
who was his teacher of English as a Sunday School fell in love, but her
parents strongly objected to their plans to marry. She threatened to leave home
and marry Yung anyway. Then before she could carry out her threat, May decided to move to Philadelphia, which gave her parents a sense of great relief. Before she left, however, May told Yung that if he loved her, he
should follow her, and he did. In
Philadelphia he opened a laundry to support himself, and hopefully, his wife to
be.
To their surprise and delight, they soon learned that May's
younger sister in San Francisco who also taught English to Chinese at the
Sunday School had similarly fallen in love with one of her pupils. Seeing the
opposition that their parents had to May's marriage plans, her younger sister
avoided a confrontation and eloped with her Chinese lover. Once that happened,
her parents, their resistance to having one Chinese son-in-law breached, gave their
blessing to May and Yung and acquired a second Chinese son-in-law.
In 1909, the sensational murder of Elsie Sigel, a young white
Sunday School teacher of English to Chinese attributed to her lover, Leon Ling,
raised alarms over the continuation of such arrangements as discussed on an earlier post on this blog.
Opposition to Chinese-White Marriages
In view of the prevalent anti-Chinese sentiments of the era,
it is not surprising that families of white women often opposed their marriages
to Chinese men in the late 19th and early 20th century. When 16-year old Florence Margaret Mark
eloped with Charlie Chong Glow in 1900, her parents and brothers were quite
upset. “If I should find that she
has married that Chinaman I would kill her,” said Mrs. Mark last night. Her
husband and sons expressed the same sentiments.”
Public attitudes toward Chinese marrying white women were
reflected as well as intensified by the negative tone of newspaper reports of
these unions. In 1898 the Augusta
Chronicle reported one such marriage between a Chinese grocer, Li Choy and
a 17-year old white woman, a descendant of Governor Pinckney of South Carolina,
in these biased terms, "Another of the Augusta colony of Chinese has taken
unto himself an American wife in lieu of a cramped-footed daughter of the
Celestial empire." It went on
to say that the bride had been "in love with Li Choy for some time, but
her mother, who was her only natural protector, was opposed to the match though
Li Choy is a devout member of the Chinese mission Sunday school at the First
Baptist Church." The article
did allow that "Li Choy is a 'good business man and has accumulated some
property."
In 1883, a Chinese, Loo Chang, who opened a store to sell
“fans, notions, and other trifles” in Waynesboro, Georgia felt the wrath of many
residents, whites as well as blacks.
They attacked him and Ah Sing, his assistant, with blows, driving them
out of town one night, and then proceeded to trash his store. Subsequent
investigation suggested that Loo Chang, who had married a young white woman
from Waynesboro, was encouraging more Chinese to move there. Concern that these
Chinamen would be marrying more white women may have triggered the violence
toward Chang.
Marriages to Daughters of Chinese Merchants
An alternative to interracial marriages developed when
Chinese merchants began to have children.
Some of their American born daughters as well as those born and living
in China married Chinese immigrant laborers either in arranged matches or via
traditional American courtship. Accounts of these marriages were not reported in newspapers because marriages of Chinese men to Chinese women were not as newsworthy as mixed
Chinese-white unions.
[ii] Some of the statistics can
be questioned as to accuracy as in the following analysis:
“We
have even more problems with the notion that in 1900 one out of every twenty
American Chinese men had white wives.
The statistic comes from Observations
on a Trip to America (1903) by Liang Qichao:
"There
are more [Chinese] women and children on the West Coast than on the East
Coast. But in America, most
Chinese try to make a living and then to return [to China], which is quite
different from those [Chinese] in Hawaii and Southeast Asia. Because so few families are here, those
who marry western women are approximately one in twenty. . . I estimate that
there are not more than 120,000 Chinese in America." [editors'
translation]
Liang was a founder of the Baohuanghui and a brilliant intellectual and keen observer. One observer noted, "However, his figures seem to us incredible. According to the1900 U.S.
Census, half of all American Chinese (45,000 of 90,000) lived in California,
and almost a quarter of the rest (10,000 of 45,000) were in Oregon. If Liang's figures are valid, this would mean that in 1900
there were 2,750 white Chinese wives in those two states. But neither state permitted
Chinese-white weddings to be performed within their borders. The same was true of Arizona, Nevada,
Idaho, and Utah. Some couples
could have gone elsewhere to be married: to Washington, Canada, Mexico, or on
the high seas beyond state jurisdiction.
But so many? When West
Coast newspapers still treated such marriages as interesting novelties and yet
never reported more than ten or twenty in any one year?"
We
find it easier to believe that Liang was making a rhetorical point rather than
reporting a statistical fact.
Generally critical of Chinese Americans, on one occasion he commented
that some had married American women, "and thus their sense of Chinese patriotism
had faded."As this threatened support for his program of radical reform in
China, he may have been exaggerating the intermarriage problem in order to
instill a sense of urgency in his readers.